Get a Free Case Review -  Call Now (803) 471-4188
Free Consultation:
(803) 451-4000
Close
Lexington, SC Pedestrian Accident Lawyers
Table of Contents

    Lexington, SC Pedestrian Accident Lawyers

    When a pedestrian accident happens in Lexington, the aftermath can be overwhelming. Amid the physical pain and emotional distress, victims often grapple with complex legal matters before they get the compensation they need.

    Retaining a legal team with experience in these sensitive cases can be crucial to securing the money you need to recover from your injuries and move forward with your life. From understanding your rights to investigating your case and calculating your damages, our team will be with you every step of the way. We understand that recovering from a pedestrian accident can take years, and you deserve to be financially covered by the person who caused those losses.

    To receive your free case review, contact our pedestrian accident attorneys at Burriss Ridgeway Injury Lawyers by calling (803) 451-4000.

    Parties that Can Be Held Responsible Through a Lexington, SC Pedestrian Accident Lawsuit

    Determining liability in a pedestrian accident is often a complex process involving multiple potential defendants. Whether it is the driver, local government, or property owner, our pedestrian accident attorneys are ready to investigate your case thoroughly and hold all responsible parties accountable. These cases often come down to your word against the defendants, so having a skilled legal team on your side can make a world of difference. The following are parties that can potentially be sued for compensation in Lexington:

    The Driver

    The vehicle’s driver is typically the first party examined for liability when a pedestrian accident occurs. If the driver behaved negligently, such as speeding, driving while impaired, or being distracted, they could be held accountable for the accident.

    Our firm is experienced in collecting evidence to establish the driver’s negligence, including obtaining police reports and witness statements. We analyze the gathered evidence to determine the most effective legal strategy to pursue for our clients.

    The Vehicle Owner

    In certain scenarios, the owner of the involved vehicle might not be the same as the driver. In such cases, if it can be proven that the owner knowingly permitted an unqualified or reckless individual to operate their vehicle, they could potentially be held liable for any harm or damage caused as a result of the accident. However, the owner’s liability would depend on the specific circumstances surrounding the accident and the extent of their knowledge about the driver’s abilities and behavior.

    Local Government Agencies

    When an accident occurs from poor road and sidewalk conditions, inadequate signage, or malfunctioning traffic lights, it is possible for local government entities to be held responsible for the incident. In such cases, pursuing a claim against a government entity can be complicated, involving specific procedures and strict deadlines.

    If you plan to file a claim against a government entity, you must follow certain rules and regulations different from those for a typical personal injury claim. For instance, you might need to file a notice of claim within a certain timeframe, which can be as short as 30 days in some cases. Additionally, you might have to comply with specific procedural requirements, such as providing detailed information about the incident and the damages you suffered.

    Construction Companies

    Construction sites are known to be high-risk areas for pedestrians because of heavy machinery, tools, and materials. Thus, it is crucial for construction companies to take necessary measures to ensure the safety of pedestrians in and around their work zones.

    This includes providing safe passage for pedestrians, marking the construction area with appropriate signage and barriers, and implementing traffic management plans to minimize the risk of accidents. If a construction company fails to take such preventive measures, and a pedestrian suffers an injury or accident, the company and any other party, like a subcontractor, that had control of the area can be held liable for negligence.

    Property Owners

    If you have been injured on private property, you might be able to seek compensation from the property owner if the accident was caused by hazards such as poor lighting or lack of maintenance on walkways. Property owners and managers are responsible for maintaining the safety of their property, including making regular inspections and foreseeing reasonable dangers that might arise. In such cases, the property owner might be held liable for the damages caused by their negligence.

    Manufacturers

    In rarer cases, a defective vehicle could be the main cause of a pedestrian’s accident. For instance, faulty brakes or malfunctioning headlights could cause a driver to lose control of their vehicle, leading to a pedestrian accident. In such cases, the vehicle manufacturer might be held liable for failing to catch the defect.

    Proving a Pedestrian Accident Case in Lexington, SC

    Proving a pedestrian accident case requires comprehensive evidence that establishes fault, proves your injuries, and demonstrates the impact the accident has had on your life. To secure compensation, building a strong case backed by compelling evidence is crucial. The following types of evidence are routinely used to prove fault in Lexington pedestrian accident cases:

    Police Reports

    The first piece of evidence in a pedestrian accident case often comes from the police report. Officers dispatched to the scene will document the incident, including details about the involved parties, witness statements, and their preliminary assessment of what occurred. Our lawyers know how to extract critical information from these reports that can be instrumental in establishing fault.

    Witness Statements

    Witnesses can provide an unbiased account of what happened, making their statements valuable evidence. They might have noticed details that you missed or observed reckless behavior from the driver before the accident. Our team knows how to effectively interview witnesses to gather useful testimony for your case.

    Surveillance Footage

    Surveillance cameras are commonplace in today’s digital age, and their footage can offer indisputable evidence of how the accident unfolded. Whether it is from traffic cameras, local businesses, or even residential security systems, our lawyers will seek out any available video footage to support your claim.

    Medical Records

    Medical records are fundamental to a pedestrian accident case, as they document the extent of your injuries, your treatment, and your prognosis. They also provide a clear link between the accident and your injuries, which is crucial for proving damages.

    Photographs and Diagrams

    Photographs from the accident scene can illustrate important details such as road conditions, vehicle damage, and the location of the impact. Diagrams can also be used to recreate the accident, offering a visual representation of how the incident occurred.

    Expert Testimony

    In some cases, expert testimony might be necessary to prove your case. This could include medical experts who can testify about your injuries, accident reconstruction experts who can explain how the accident occurred, or economic experts who can calculate future losses. Our legal team has a network of reputable experts we can call upon to strengthen your case.

    Our Lexington, SC Pedestrian Accident Attorneys Can Help Get Justice for Your Injuries

    Call Burriss Ridgeway Injury Lawyers today at (803) 451-4000 for a free case evaluation with our pedestrian accident lawyers.

    Resources

    Get a Free Consultation

    Results

    $6 Million
    The Plaintiff was injured as a result of a failing component of a commercial motor vehicle that fell from the vehicle into the roadway. The Plaintiff brought claims against the owner and operator of the tractor trailer as well as the manufacturer of the vehicle.
    The Plaintiff was injured as a result of a failing component of a commercial motor vehicle that fell from the vehicle into the roadway. The Plaintiff brought claims against the owner and operator of the tractor trailer as well as the manufacturer of the vehicle.
    $4.1 Million
    The Plaintiff was insured as a result of a refrigeration system that malfunctioned, spraying ammonia gas into the Plaintiff's face. As a result of this event, the Plaintiff sustained significant vision loss. The Plaintiff brought claims against his employer and the manufacturer of this system.
    The Plaintiff was insured as a result of a refrigeration system that malfunctioned, spraying ammonia gas into the Plaintiff's face. As a result of this event, the Plaintiff sustained significant vision loss. The Plaintiff brought claims against his employer and the manufacturer of this system.
    $2 Million
    The Plaintiff was injured while riding his motorcycle when he collided with another vehicle. This event occurred in the city of Columbia and the Plaintiff sustained significant bodily injury resulting in extensive medical expenses and permanent injury.
    The Plaintiff was injured while riding his motorcycle when he collided with another vehicle. This event occurred in the city of Columbia and the Plaintiff sustained significant bodily injury resulting in extensive medical expenses and permanent injury.
    $1.8 Million
    The Plaintiff was injured when he was rear-ended by a tractor trailer on Interstate 20. The Plaintiff brought claims against the owner and driver of the tractor trailer for his injuries relate to his lower back.
    The Plaintiff was injured when he was rear-ended by a tractor trailer on Interstate 20. The Plaintiff brought claims against the owner and driver of the tractor trailer for his injuries relate to his lower back.
    $1.5 Million
    The Plaintiff sustained significant injury when she was attacked by a dog while performing repairs on a rental property. The Plaintiff was at the rental property as part of her employment with a rental management agency. She was attacked by the animal and sustained permanent nerve damage in her legs.
    The Plaintiff sustained significant injury when she was attacked by a dog while performing repairs on a rental property. The Plaintiff was at the rental property as part of her employment with a rental management agency. She was attacked by the animal and sustained permanent nerve damage in her legs.
    $1.3 Million
    The Plaintiff was killed as a result of a collision with a logging truck that had been improperly loaded by a timber harvester. The proceeds of the settlement were funded by both the timber harvester and the owner of the logging truck.
    The Plaintiff was killed as a result of a collision with a logging truck that had been improperly loaded by a timber harvester. The proceeds of the settlement were funded by both the timber harvester and the owner of the logging truck.
    $1.5 Million
    The Plaintiff underwent surgery to her neck as a result of injuries sustained when she was struck on the head by a piece of loading equipment at her job. The Plaintiff was employed by a national retailer and was engaged in stocking shelves when the piece of equipment failed. After settling her workers' compensation claim, the Plaintiff brought a claim against the manufacturer of this equipment.
    The Plaintiff underwent surgery to her neck as a result of injuries sustained when she was struck on the head by a piece of loading equipment at her job. The Plaintiff was employed by a national retailer and was engaged in stocking shelves when the piece of equipment failed. After settling her workers' compensation claim, the Plaintiff brought a claim against the manufacturer of this equipment.
    $1.1 Million
    The Plaintiff brought a claim against a local medical facility for a false positive HIV reading. As a result of this false positive, the Plaintiff lived for 4½ years believing that she had the virus which leads to what she feared was an eventual AIDS diagnosis.
    The Plaintiff brought a claim against a local medical facility for a false positive HIV reading. As a result of this false positive, the Plaintiff lived for 4½ years believing that she had the virus which leads to what she feared was an eventual AIDS diagnosis.
    Read More

    Resources

    Recent Posts

    Client Reviews