Get a Free Case Review -  Call Now (803) 471-4188
Free Consultation:
(803) 451-4000
Close
Lexington, SC Attorney for Personal Injury Case Referrals
Table of Contents

    Lexington, SC Attorney for Personal Injury Case Referrals

    When an attorney has a client with a personal injury case that they cannot handle, the best thing they can do for their client is refer them to an attorney who can meet the challenge.

    Attorneys can have several reasons for referring a client’s case to an experienced personal injury attorney. In many cases, a client’s injuries occurred in Lexington, but the attorney is not licensed to practice law in South Carolina. In other cases, the attorney might be local but practices in an area of law other than personal injuries. Regardless of the reasons, our personal injury attorneys can help your client recover the compensation they deserve. Our firm is extremely knowledgeable in nearly every type of personal injury claim a victim can make.

    If you need to refer your client’s personal injury case, our personal injury attorneys in Lexington can help determine the best path to recovering compensation. For a free review of your client’s case, call Burriss Ridgeway Injury Lawyers today at (803) 451-4000.

    Types of Personal Injury Cases that Our Lexington, SC Attorneys Handle

    Personal injury law is a vast field of practice encompassing many types of claims. Our personal injury attorneys pride themselves on being able to help clients recover compensation in virtually any type of personal injury lawsuit. Our firm is more than capable of handling common cases, like premises liability for a slip and fall accident, but we can also provide support in more complex cases, including nursing home abuse cases and medical malpractice claims.

    Vehicle Accidents

    Many personal injuries result from car accidents. While car accidents are common, each case is unique and might have important details that can significantly impact the outcome. However, car accident cases can become complex very fast. In some cases, multiple drivers might have contributed to causing your client’s injuries and will need to be sued. If your client was injured in a truck accident, we can determine if the truck driver’s employer can be held liable for the negligence of its employee. We can also accept cases where the client is an injured pedestrian.

    Construction Accidents

    Our personal injury attorneys can also help your client if they are injured on construction sites in South Carolina. Construction accidents are some of the most complex in personal injury law. Fortunately, our lawyers have years of experience litigating these types of personal injury cases. There are many that an employer can be held liable for violating. However, it takes an attorney who knows what to look for to be successful.

    Motorcycle Accidents

    Motorcycle accidents are extremely dangerous since the rider has virtually no protection from the force of a vehicle collision. Like typical drivers, many motorcyclists travel to and through South Carolina yearly. Considering the large motorcycle festivals that take place in the state annually, South Carolina is a hotbed for motorcycle accidents. Our personal injury attorneys can help your client if they were a motorcycle accident victim in South Carolina so that they can focus on their recovery at home.

    Drunk Driving Accidents

    Our attorneys also have years of experience handling drunk driving cases. These accidents can occur on quiet backroads or busy highways. Regardless, they can result in severe consequences for both parties. However, if your client was injured in a drunk driving accident, their civil suit will generally need to wait for any criminal proceedings against the driver to conclude. However, if convicted, we can use the defendant’s guilty verdict as evidence in your client’s civil lawsuit.

    Pedestrian Accidents

    Some accidents only involve one vehicle and a pedestrian with catastrophic injuries. If your client was injured while walking in South Carolina, they can file a lawsuit against the driver responsible. Unfortunately, some drivers flee the scene after striking a pedestrian, a crime in South Carolina. Our firm can work with law enforcement to help identify the driver, aiding them with our own investigation so that the driver can be sued.

    Legal Concerns Specific to Car Accident Cases in South Carolina

    If you are considering referring your client’s car accident case, there are a couple of South Carolina laws that you should be aware of that could significantly impact your client’s case. These laws play an important role in how our personal injury attorneys strategize your client’s case.

    Statute of Limitations

    Fortunately, South Carolina has one of the longest statutes of limitations to file a lawsuit. The statute of limitations for car accident cases is three years. Compare this to nearby states like Georgia, which provides two years to file, and Tennessee, which allows only one year for victims to file their claims. Still, speak with our personal injury attorneys to get your client’s case moving forward as soon as possible.

    At-Fault Insurance Rules

    South Carolina employs at-fault insurance rules, which might need clarification if your client is from a no-fault insurance state. Car accident victims in South Carolina can start the recovery process by filing a third-party liability claim against the at-fault driver. Under at-fault insurance rules, they can also file a lawsuit for damages, unlike no-fault insurance, which typically limits a victim’s right to sue.

    In many cases, a lawsuit will be necessary. South Carolina only requires drivers to carry a $25,000 minimum liability coverage per person, which can run out quickly in more serious cases. Insurance also might not cover certain damages, like pain and suffering. Our personal injury attorneys can review your client’s case to determine the compensation options available and file a lawsuit if that proves the right move.

    Contributory Negligence

    Every state has a rule for determining how to award a plaintiff if they contributed to causing their car accident. South Caroline uses a modified comparative negligence rule that bars plaintiffs from recovering compensation if they are found to have contributed a higher percentage of fault than the defendant, also known as the “51% rule.” If they can recover damages despite their negligence, a plaintiff’s award will be reduced by the percentage of fault they were found to have contributed.

    This is a better rule than the pure contributory negligence rule used in North Carolina, which bars victims from recovering compensation if they contributed to their accident in even the slightest way. Our personal injury attorneys can help your client if they fear something they did could be used against them in their lawsuit.

    Our South Carolina Attorneys for Car Accident Case Referrals Can Help

    If you need to refer your client’s car accident case, our South Carolina attorneys for car accident case referrals are ready to discuss their case and how we can help. For a free review of your client’s case, call Burriss Ridgeway Injury Lawyers today at (803) 451-4000.

    Resources

    Get a Free Consultation

    Results

    $6 Million
    The Plaintiff was injured as a result of a failing component of a commercial motor vehicle that fell from the vehicle into the roadway. The Plaintiff brought claims against the owner and operator of the tractor trailer as well as the manufacturer of the vehicle.
    The Plaintiff was injured as a result of a failing component of a commercial motor vehicle that fell from the vehicle into the roadway. The Plaintiff brought claims against the owner and operator of the tractor trailer as well as the manufacturer of the vehicle.
    $4.1 Million
    The Plaintiff was insured as a result of a refrigeration system that malfunctioned, spraying ammonia gas into the Plaintiff's face. As a result of this event, the Plaintiff sustained significant vision loss. The Plaintiff brought claims against his employer and the manufacturer of this system.
    The Plaintiff was insured as a result of a refrigeration system that malfunctioned, spraying ammonia gas into the Plaintiff's face. As a result of this event, the Plaintiff sustained significant vision loss. The Plaintiff brought claims against his employer and the manufacturer of this system.
    $2 Million
    The Plaintiff was injured while riding his motorcycle when he collided with another vehicle. This event occurred in the city of Columbia and the Plaintiff sustained significant bodily injury resulting in extensive medical expenses and permanent injury.
    The Plaintiff was injured while riding his motorcycle when he collided with another vehicle. This event occurred in the city of Columbia and the Plaintiff sustained significant bodily injury resulting in extensive medical expenses and permanent injury.
    $1.8 Million
    The Plaintiff was injured when he was rear-ended by a tractor trailer on Interstate 20. The Plaintiff brought claims against the owner and driver of the tractor trailer for his injuries relate to his lower back.
    The Plaintiff was injured when he was rear-ended by a tractor trailer on Interstate 20. The Plaintiff brought claims against the owner and driver of the tractor trailer for his injuries relate to his lower back.
    $1.5 Million
    The Plaintiff sustained significant injury when she was attacked by a dog while performing repairs on a rental property. The Plaintiff was at the rental property as part of her employment with a rental management agency. She was attacked by the animal and sustained permanent nerve damage in her legs.
    The Plaintiff sustained significant injury when she was attacked by a dog while performing repairs on a rental property. The Plaintiff was at the rental property as part of her employment with a rental management agency. She was attacked by the animal and sustained permanent nerve damage in her legs.
    $1.3 Million
    The Plaintiff was killed as a result of a collision with a logging truck that had been improperly loaded by a timber harvester. The proceeds of the settlement were funded by both the timber harvester and the owner of the logging truck.
    The Plaintiff was killed as a result of a collision with a logging truck that had been improperly loaded by a timber harvester. The proceeds of the settlement were funded by both the timber harvester and the owner of the logging truck.
    $1.5 Million
    The Plaintiff underwent surgery to her neck as a result of injuries sustained when she was struck on the head by a piece of loading equipment at her job. The Plaintiff was employed by a national retailer and was engaged in stocking shelves when the piece of equipment failed. After settling her workers' compensation claim, the Plaintiff brought a claim against the manufacturer of this equipment.
    The Plaintiff underwent surgery to her neck as a result of injuries sustained when she was struck on the head by a piece of loading equipment at her job. The Plaintiff was employed by a national retailer and was engaged in stocking shelves when the piece of equipment failed. After settling her workers' compensation claim, the Plaintiff brought a claim against the manufacturer of this equipment.
    $1.1 Million
    The Plaintiff brought a claim against a local medical facility for a false positive HIV reading. As a result of this false positive, the Plaintiff lived for 4½ years believing that she had the virus which leads to what she feared was an eventual AIDS diagnosis.
    The Plaintiff brought a claim against a local medical facility for a false positive HIV reading. As a result of this false positive, the Plaintiff lived for 4½ years believing that she had the virus which leads to what she feared was an eventual AIDS diagnosis.
    Read More

    Resources

    Recent Posts

    Client Reviews