Get a Free Case Review -  (803) 471-4188
Free Consultation:
(803) 451-4000
Close
Dentsville, SC Uber + Lyft Rideshare Accident Lawyer
Table of Contents

    Dentsville, SC Uber + Lyft Rideshare Accident Lawyer

    People use rideshare services like Lyft and Uber daily. Unfortunately, accidents involving rideshare vehicles are startlingly common, and riders and other drivers are often hurt. If you were injured in an accident with an Uber or Lyft vehicle, a lawyer can help you sue for damages.

    It might be unclear who is responsible for the accident in the immediate aftermath. Your attorney can help you piece together details from the accident and a police report to determine whom to sue. The driver of the Uber or Lyft may be responsible, but so might other drivers on the road. You may end up suing more than one person, and we may need to gather additional evidence to support your case.

    Contact our Uber and Lyft rideshare accident attorneys for a confidential, free legal review by calling Burriss Ridgeway Injury Lawyers at (803) 451-4000.

    Who Can I Sue After an Accident Involving a Lyft or Uber Rideshare?

    After an accident with an Uber or Lyft, you may sue the person or people you believe are responsible. This might be one driver or several, depending on the circumstances.

    The Rideshare Driver

    In many cases, injured plaintiffs sue the rideshare driver who caused the accident. Rideshare drivers are often in a hurry because they earn more money by completing more rides. They may be more likely to speed or take risks on the road to complete a ride faster. Unfortunately, this often leads to accidents.

    Other Drivers

    It is entirely possible that your rideshare driver is not responsible for the accident. Instead, another driver involved in the collision may be to blame. They might have collided with the Uber or Lyft vehicle you were riding in due to their own negligence, not the Uber or Lyft driver’s.

    Another possibility is that both drivers share responsibility, and you can include both of them in your lawsuit.

    Uber and Lyft

    You might be thinking about suing the rideshare companies Uber or Lyft, but this may be difficult. These companies are often not held vicariously liable for accidents because rideshare drivers are considered independent contractors rather than employees. However, if the company should have never permitted a negligent rideshare driver to drive, our Uber and Lyft rideshare accident attorneys may sue the company for negligent hiring or negligent entrustment.

    FAQs About Legal Claims for Accidents with Lyft and Uber Rideshare Vehicles in Dentsville, SC

    Can I Sue for an Accident Involving a Rideshare Vehicle?

    Yes. An accident involving a rideshare vehicle, such as Uber or Lyft, may be treated as any other vehicle accident. You can and should file insurance claims to cover your costs, and if insurance is not enough, you should sue those responsible for the accident. Get an attorney to help you as soon as possible.

    How Do I File an Insurance Claim After an Accident with an Uber or Lyft?

    After the accident, you need to exchange information with the driver so you can file an insurance claim. You may file a claim with their insurance or with Uber or Lyft’s insurance. If the rideshare driver was actively driving and considered “on duty,” the rideshare company’s insurance may apply. If their driving app was turned off, it may not, and you may have to go through the driver’s personal auto insurance.

    Who Should Be Held Responsible for a Rideshare Accident in Dentsville, SC?

    In many cases, the driver of the rideshare vehicle is held responsible, but this is not always the case. Another driver might be to blame, and the police should investigate to determine what happened and who is responsible. In many cases, multiple drivers share responsibility, and seeking compensation can be tricky.

    What Kind of Evidence Comes Up in Lawsuits for Rideshare Accidents?

    If you sue the person or people responsible for the accident, you need strong evidence to meet your burden of proof. Evidence often includes, but may not be limited to, witness testimony, dashcam videos, photos of the crash scene, and medical records about your injuries.

    What is the Best Way to Get Financial Compensation After an Accident with an Uber or Lyft?

    There may not be a single best way to get compensation, as you may have multiple options to explore. Many injured victims first pursue insurance claims. However, insurance may not be sufficient or available if the driver is uninsured. You can file a lawsuit to get compensation. Although a lawsuit can be time-consuming, it may net you compensation for the full extent of your damages.

    How Do I Contact Uber or Lyft About an Accident?

    It may not be a good idea to contact the rideshare company directly after an accident. These companies often want to evade responsibility and may not be forthcoming with the information you need to hold them responsible. It is better to have your attorney be your point of contact. Your lawyer should call the rideshare company to report the accident, get insurance information, and exchange any other necessary information.

    Do I Have to Be a Passenger in an Uber or Lyft to Sue for Damages After a Crash?

    No. While passengers in Uber or Lyft vehicles can sue for their injuries and damages, you may also sue if you were a passenger or driver in a different vehicle that was struck by the Uber or Lyft vehicle. You do not even have to be in a car. If you are a pedestrian who was struck by a rideshare driver, you can sue them for damages.

    Who Do I Sue if Multiple Drivers Are Involved in an Uber or Lyft Accident?

    You may sue as many drivers as necessary to get compensation for your damages. This might mean suing one, two, or several drivers. The trickiest part is identifying all the drivers who should be included in the case. Whomever you sue, you need evidence to prove their responsibility for the accident.

    How Long After a Rideshare Accident Can I File a Lawsuit?

    Lawsuits for car accidents, including rideshare accidents, must be filed within the time limit established by the statute of limitations for personal injuries. Injured victims must sue those responsible for the accident within 3 years. If this time passes and nothing is filed, plaintiffs may be time-barred and cannot sue for the accident.

    Should I File Insurance Claims Before a Lawsuit After a Rideshare Accident?

    Yes. Even if you have reason to believe that your insurance claim will be denied or that it will not be enough to cover your damages, it is a good idea to file it anyway. Courts typically want plaintiffs to exhaust their insurance options before filing a lawsuit. If you get to court and the judge finds out you never pursued an insurance claim, they might postpone your case until you do.

    Contact Our Uber and Lyft Rideshare Accident Attorneys in Dentsville, SC

    Contact our Uber and Lyft rideshare accident attorneys for a confidential, free legal review by calling Burriss Ridgeway Injury Lawyers at (803) 451-4000.

    Resources

    Get a Free Consultation

    Results

    $8.5 Million
    Client’s husband was struck and killed by a speeding driver working for a South Carolina corporation who was in the course and scope of his employment at the time of the crash. The decedent left behind a spouse and three children.
    Client’s husband was struck and killed by a speeding driver working for a South Carolina corporation who was in the course and scope of his employment at the time of the crash. The decedent left behind a spouse and three children.
    $6.2 Million
    Client was struck and killed by a commercial vehicle that was distracted at the time of the crash. The event occurred on a rural South Carolina roadway. Claims were brought against the driver as well as the corporation.
    Client was struck and killed by a commercial vehicle that was distracted at the time of the crash. The event occurred on a rural South Carolina roadway. Claims were brought against the driver as well as the corporation.
    $6 Million
    The Plaintiff was injured as a result of a failing component of a commercial motor vehicle that fell from the vehicle into the roadway. The Plaintiff brought claims against the owner and operator of the tractor trailer as well as the manufacturer of the vehicle.
    The Plaintiff was injured as a result of a failing component of a commercial motor vehicle that fell from the vehicle into the roadway. The Plaintiff brought claims against the owner and operator of the tractor trailer as well as the manufacturer of the vehicle.
    $5 Million
    The client’s child was killed in a crash involving a trucking company. Claims were brought against both the trucking company and the owner of the faulty equipment that was unsafe for use on the roadway.
    The client’s child was killed in a crash involving a trucking company. Claims were brought against both the trucking company and the owner of the faulty equipment that was unsafe for use on the roadway.
    $4.1 Million
    The Plaintiff was injured as a result of a refrigeration system that malfunctioned, spraying ammonia gas into the Plaintiff's face. As a result of this event, the Plaintiff sustained significant vision loss. The Plaintiff brought claims against his employer and the manufacturer of this system.
    The Plaintiff was injured as a result of a refrigeration system that malfunctioned, spraying ammonia gas into the Plaintiff's face. As a result of this event, the Plaintiff sustained significant vision loss. The Plaintiff brought claims against his employer and the manufacturer of this system.
    $2 Million
    The Plaintiff was injured while riding his motorcycle when he collided with another vehicle. This event occurred in the city of Columbia and the Plaintiff sustained significant bodily injury resulting in extensive medical expenses and permanent injury.
    The Plaintiff was injured while riding his motorcycle when he collided with another vehicle. This event occurred in the city of Columbia and the Plaintiff sustained significant bodily injury resulting in extensive medical expenses and permanent injury.
    $1.8 Million
    The Plaintiff was injured when he was rear-ended by a tractor trailer on Interstate 20. The Plaintiff brought claims against the owner and driver of the tractor trailer for his injuries relate to his lower back.
    The Plaintiff was injured when he was rear-ended by a tractor trailer on Interstate 20. The Plaintiff brought claims against the owner and driver of the tractor trailer for his injuries relate to his lower back.
    $1.5 Million
    The Plaintiff sustained significant injury when she was attacked by a dog while performing repairs on a rental property. The Plaintiff was at the rental property as part of her employment with a rental management agency. She was attacked by the animal and sustained permanent nerve damage in her legs.
    The Plaintiff sustained significant injury when she was attacked by a dog while performing repairs on a rental property. The Plaintiff was at the rental property as part of her employment with a rental management agency. She was attacked by the animal and sustained permanent nerve damage in her legs.
    $1.3 Million
    The Plaintiff was killed as a result of a collision with a logging truck that had been improperly loaded by a timber harvester. The proceeds of the settlement were funded by both the timber harvester and the owner of the logging truck.
    The Plaintiff was killed as a result of a collision with a logging truck that had been improperly loaded by a timber harvester. The proceeds of the settlement were funded by both the timber harvester and the owner of the logging truck.
    $1.5 Million
    The Plaintiff underwent surgery to her neck as a result of injuries sustained when she was struck on the head by a piece of loading equipment at her job. The Plaintiff was employed by a national retailer and was engaged in stocking shelves when the piece of equipment failed. After settling her workers' compensation claim, the Plaintiff brought a claim against the manufacturer of this equipment.
    The Plaintiff underwent surgery to her neck as a result of injuries sustained when she was struck on the head by a piece of loading equipment at her job. The Plaintiff was employed by a national retailer and was engaged in stocking shelves when the piece of equipment failed. After settling her workers' compensation claim, the Plaintiff brought a claim against the manufacturer of this equipment.
    $1.1 Million
    The Plaintiff brought a claim against a local medical facility for a false positive HIV reading. As a result of this false positive, the Plaintiff lived for 4½ years believing that she had the virus which leads to what she feared was an eventual AIDS diagnosis.
    The Plaintiff brought a claim against a local medical facility for a false positive HIV reading. As a result of this false positive, the Plaintiff lived for 4½ years believing that she had the virus which leads to what she feared was an eventual AIDS diagnosis.
    Read More

    Resources

    Recent Posts

    Client Reviews