Get a Free Case Review -  Call Now (803) 471-4188
Free Consultation:
(803) 451-4000
Close
Cayce, SC Car Accident Lawyer
Table of Contents

    Cayce, SC Car Accident Lawyer

    In Cayce, most people drive around every day without any major issues. However, there are times when unexpected events occur because of another person’s negligence.

    When tragedy occurs on account of another, you are entitled to financial compensation for your injuries. Our experienced team is here to help you pursue the damages you deserve for the harm you have experienced. We know that injuries from a car accident can completely disrupt your life, which is why we are here to provide you with the support you need to move forward with your life. We can evaluate your claim so that every expense is accounted for and pursue it with the zeal our firm is known for.

    For a free case assessment with our car accident lawyers, contact Burriss Ridgeway Injury Lawyers by calling (803) 451-4000.

    Damages You Might Be Entitled to in a Cayce, SC Car Accident Claim

    Compensation in a car accident case is intended to make you whole again, or at least as close as possible to your pre-accident state. That means accounting for not only your economic losses but also your non-economic harm. Our car accident attorneys have years of experience evaluating cases and can put that knowledge to use in your case. The following are damages you can claim from the negligent party in a lawsuit:

    Economic Damages

    When someone is injured in a car accident, the bulk of their claim will deal with the economic damages the victim has suffered. These damages are intended to compensate the victim for the financial losses they incurred from the accident. Economic damages are tangible and quantifiable costs that can be calculated and documented.

    One of the primary components of economic damages is medical expenses. This includes all costs related to the medical care the victim receives because of the accident, such as emergency room visits, surgeries, hospitalization, medication, physical therapy, and any future medical expenses if ongoing care is required.

    Another component of economic damages is lost wages. If the victim’s injury forces them to take time off work, they might be compensated for their lost income during that period. If the injury affects the victim’s ability to earn in the future, they can also claim for loss of earning capacity.

    Lastly, property damage is also included in economic damages. If the victim’s vehicle or other personal belongings were damaged in the accident, the cost of repair or replacement is included. This can encompass various types of damage, such as structural damage, cosmetic damage, or any other type of damage that occurred because of the accident.

    Non-Economic Damages

    While economic damages cover the financial losses suffered by the victim, non-economic damages compensate for the intangible or non-financial impacts of the accident. These damages are subjective and often harder to quantify than economic damages.

    One common type of non-economic damages is pain and suffering. This includes the physical pain and discomfort that a victim experiences during and after the accident. It can also include emotional pain, such as the trauma of the accident itself, as well as the pain that comes with the recovery process.

    Another type of non-economic damages is compensation for emotional distress. Accidents can have serious psychological impacts on victims, such as anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). These are all valid reasons for seeking compensation for emotional distress, as it aims to acknowledge the impact the accident has had on the victim’s mental health.

    Loss of enjoyment of life is another type of non-economic damages that victims might be awarded. If the injuries sustained in the accident prevent the victim from enjoying activities and hobbies they once loved, they might be compensated for this loss. This can include anything from being unable to participate in sports or hobbies to being unable to enjoy social activities with friends and family.

    Lastly, there is loss of consortium, which refers to the negative effects an accident can have on a victim’s relationship with their spouse or family. This can include loss of companionship and affection and the inability to engage in intimate activities.

    Punitive Damages

    In Cayce, punitive damages serve a specific purpose. Unlike the compensatory damages above, which aim to reimburse the victim for their losses, punitive damages are intended to punish the at-fault party for their actions and deter similar behavior in the future. Punitive damages can be awarded in cases where the defendant’s actions were willful, reckless, or malicious.

    Examples of such actions might include intentionally causing harm, recklessly disregarding the safety of others, or acting with a conscious disregard for the rights or well-being of others. However, punitive damages are not common and are typically only awarded in cases involving extreme wrongdoing.

    The amount of punitive damages awarded varies depending on the severity of the defendant’s conduct and the resulting harm caused to the victim. In some cases, the amount of punitive damages awarded might be significantly higher than that of compensatory damages.

    How Damages from a Car Accident Case Are Calculated in Cayce, SC

    Calculating damages in a Cayce car accident case is a complex process typically involving various factors. The “per diem” and multiplier approaches offer structured ways to quantify non-economic damages like pain and suffering, as well as the others mentioned above. By understanding these methods, you can gain a clearer picture of what your claim might be worth:

    The “Per Diem” Approach

    The “per diem,” Latin for “per day,” is a common method for calculating non-economic damages. The idea is to assign a certain dollar amount for each day you have had to live with the pain and discomfort caused by your injuries from the accident.

    For example, if you were in significant pain for 100 days following the accident, and a daily rate of $100 was chosen, you would be entitled to $10,000 for pain and suffering under the per diem method. The daily rate can be determined in several ways, but it is usually based on your actual daily earnings.

    The Multiplier Approach

    The multiplier approach is another method used to calculate non-economic damages. With this approach, the total economic damages, like medical bills and lost wages, are added and multiplied by a certain number. This number is typically between 1.5 and 5 and determines the value of non-economic damages.

    The specific multiplier used depends on several factors, including the severity of your injuries, the extent of your medical treatment, any long-term effects of your injuries, and how your injuries have impacted your daily life. For example, if your economic damages totaled $20,000 and a multiplier of 3 was chosen based on the severity of your injuries, you would be entitled to $60,000 for pain and suffering.

    Our Cayce, SC Car Accident Lawyers Can Provide Critical Legal Support During Your Time in Need

    Call our car accident attorneys at Burriss Ridgeway Injury Lawyers at (803) 451-4000 for a free review of your case.

    Resources

    Get a Free Consultation

    Results

    $6 Million
    The Plaintiff was injured as a result of a failing component of a commercial motor vehicle that fell from the vehicle into the roadway. The Plaintiff brought claims against the owner and operator of the tractor trailer as well as the manufacturer of the vehicle.
    The Plaintiff was injured as a result of a failing component of a commercial motor vehicle that fell from the vehicle into the roadway. The Plaintiff brought claims against the owner and operator of the tractor trailer as well as the manufacturer of the vehicle.
    $4.1 Million
    The Plaintiff was insured as a result of a refrigeration system that malfunctioned, spraying ammonia gas into the Plaintiff's face. As a result of this event, the Plaintiff sustained significant vision loss. The Plaintiff brought claims against his employer and the manufacturer of this system.
    The Plaintiff was insured as a result of a refrigeration system that malfunctioned, spraying ammonia gas into the Plaintiff's face. As a result of this event, the Plaintiff sustained significant vision loss. The Plaintiff brought claims against his employer and the manufacturer of this system.
    $2 Million
    The Plaintiff was injured while riding his motorcycle when he collided with another vehicle. This event occurred in the city of Columbia and the Plaintiff sustained significant bodily injury resulting in extensive medical expenses and permanent injury.
    The Plaintiff was injured while riding his motorcycle when he collided with another vehicle. This event occurred in the city of Columbia and the Plaintiff sustained significant bodily injury resulting in extensive medical expenses and permanent injury.
    $1.8 Million
    The Plaintiff was injured when he was rear-ended by a tractor trailer on Interstate 20. The Plaintiff brought claims against the owner and driver of the tractor trailer for his injuries relate to his lower back.
    The Plaintiff was injured when he was rear-ended by a tractor trailer on Interstate 20. The Plaintiff brought claims against the owner and driver of the tractor trailer for his injuries relate to his lower back.
    $1.5 Million
    The Plaintiff sustained significant injury when she was attacked by a dog while performing repairs on a rental property. The Plaintiff was at the rental property as part of her employment with a rental management agency. She was attacked by the animal and sustained permanent nerve damage in her legs.
    The Plaintiff sustained significant injury when she was attacked by a dog while performing repairs on a rental property. The Plaintiff was at the rental property as part of her employment with a rental management agency. She was attacked by the animal and sustained permanent nerve damage in her legs.
    $1.3 Million
    The Plaintiff was killed as a result of a collision with a logging truck that had been improperly loaded by a timber harvester. The proceeds of the settlement were funded by both the timber harvester and the owner of the logging truck.
    The Plaintiff was killed as a result of a collision with a logging truck that had been improperly loaded by a timber harvester. The proceeds of the settlement were funded by both the timber harvester and the owner of the logging truck.
    $1.5 Million
    The Plaintiff underwent surgery to her neck as a result of injuries sustained when she was struck on the head by a piece of loading equipment at her job. The Plaintiff was employed by a national retailer and was engaged in stocking shelves when the piece of equipment failed. After settling her workers' compensation claim, the Plaintiff brought a claim against the manufacturer of this equipment.
    The Plaintiff underwent surgery to her neck as a result of injuries sustained when she was struck on the head by a piece of loading equipment at her job. The Plaintiff was employed by a national retailer and was engaged in stocking shelves when the piece of equipment failed. After settling her workers' compensation claim, the Plaintiff brought a claim against the manufacturer of this equipment.
    $1.1 Million
    The Plaintiff brought a claim against a local medical facility for a false positive HIV reading. As a result of this false positive, the Plaintiff lived for 4½ years believing that she had the virus which leads to what she feared was an eventual AIDS diagnosis.
    The Plaintiff brought a claim against a local medical facility for a false positive HIV reading. As a result of this false positive, the Plaintiff lived for 4½ years believing that she had the virus which leads to what she feared was an eventual AIDS diagnosis.
    Read More

    Resources

    Recent Posts

    Client Reviews